top of page

A Moldy Sandwich: Why the Feedback Sandwich Method May Be Doing More Harm Than Good

Updated: Aug 1


In the landscape of employee feedback strategies, few have been as widely adopted—and as hotly debated—as the feedback sandwich method. Made popular in the 1980s by Mary Kay Cosmetics Founder Mary Kay Ash, this approach suggests sandwiching a negative piece of constructive criticism between two layers of positive feedback. On the surface, it appears to be a thoughtful way to soften the impact of negative feedback, but its practical effectiveness is increasingly being called into question by both researchers and practitioners alike. In practice, we have found it can become detrimental when applied as the go-to strategy.

 

Issues with the Sandwich Method

While the sandwich method aims to balance criticism with praise, its application often falls short in several critical areas. Employees are generally insightful enough to detect when compliments are insincere or strategically placed. This can lead them to discounting the positive feedback altogether, seeing it as merely a prelude to the impending criticism rather than genuine recognition of their efforts.


The supposed cushioning effect of positive comments between negatives doesn't effectively mitigate the impact of criticism either. Research and anecdotal evidence suggest that the human mind tends to weigh negative feedback more heavily than positive, especially when presented in this structured format. This can leave employees feeling more criticized than appreciated, undermining the goal the sandwich method intends to achieve.


The Ratio Conundrum

The feedback sandwich method overlooks the importance of feedback ratios that have been empirically shown to be more effective. Studies indicate that a ratio of positive to negative feedback ideally ranges from 3:1 to 5:1. This balanced approach ensures that employees feel valued and motivated, even when receiving constructive criticism. Unfortunately, the sandwich method often fails to adhere to these ratios, providing inadequate positive reinforcement to counterbalance the critique effectively.


If you are now thinking, 'I'll just use a 2:1:2 ratio' Hold that thought for a moment. Your positive feedback, no matter how sincere and impactful, can inadvertently be overshadowed by negative comments. The key lies in how feedback is delivered—promptly and distinctly. Whether it's constructive criticism or praise, timely feedback ensures its effectiveness and ability to create impact and change.


Making Matters Worse

 

Another significant pitfall of the sandwich method is the temptation for managers to manufacture positive feedback simply to adhere to the structure. This artificial positivity can come across as disingenuous and erode trust between managers and employees. When feedback lacks authenticity, employees are less likely to internalize it or see it as valuable input for their professional growth. This may lead to both hesitation and suspicion of future positive feedback as they wait for the bad news they believe will follow. This can gravely impact your employees' mental health as they are waiting for the perceived negativity they have come to learn to come after the praise.  

 


A More Effective Approach


So, what alternatives exist to the outdated sandwich method? Effective feedback should be timely, specific, and balanced. Here are some strategies that organizations can adopt to foster a culture of constructive feedback:

 

1. Voice the Issue Directly:


Address concerns straightforwardly and respectfully. As Brenee Brown says – Clear is Kind and Unclear is Unkind


2. Seek Their Perspective:


Encourage open dialogue to understand the employee's viewpoint and experiences related to the feedback. Don’t share your perspective until they know you understand theirs.


3. Listen Actively and Ask Questions:


Engage in active listening and ask questions to gain deeper insights into the situation. Listen to what they have to say. Go in willing to learn, not to reprimand.


4. Collaborate on Solutions:


Focus on problem-solving together rather than dwelling solely on the problems identified. Identify gaps in knowledge, understanding or process/procedures.

 




Remember - Feedback is not just about correction—it's about collaboration and cultivation. Fostering a workplace where your team can work together to make feedback a catalyst for positive change and professional advancement is vital in today's diverse workplace.

 

 

While the feedback sandwich method may have originated from good intentions, its execution often falls short of fostering genuine growth and improvement among employees. By prioritizing sincerity, balance, and regular positive reinforcement, organizations can cultivate a culture of open communication and continuous learning within their teams.

 


Bonus Tip

Demonstrating genuine appreciation and providing frequent positive feedback are crucial components of effective feedback practices. When employees feel valued and recognized for their contributions by those in leadership, they are more likely to embrace constructive criticism as a means for personal and professional growth. This approach not only builds trust but also fosters a positive work environment where feedback is seen as a tool for development rather than mere evaluation.

 

 

If your organization struggles with implementing effective feedback practices that lead to lasting change, consider exploring workshops and training sessions focused on feedback and communication skills. These initiatives can empower leaders and employees alike to engage in meaningful conversations that drive personal and organizational success.


Interested in enhancing your team's feedback skills? Reach out to us at info@KoreroSolutions.com to learn more about our tailored workshops and solutions. Together, let's build a workplace where feedback is embraced as a pathway to success and growth.

bottom of page